Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Kolhapur vs Vinayak Annappa Yenchawandi and Ors.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7627 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 10772 OF 2024

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 11/09/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

As per Bailiff’s Report dated 05/07/2024, Notice of Respondent No. 2 is returned unserved with remark “expired“

¶8

The above numbered Interim Application (ST) is listed for second time on the board of Registrar for taking steps to bring the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2 on record. Already 03 weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting 03 weeks time, learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps for bringing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2 on record.

¶9

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 6 (2)of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960, in cases where 90 days have elapsed from the reported death of any of the parties to the appeal and no action has been taken by the Appellant to bring the heirs of the deceased party on record the matter shall be placed before the Registrar for orders regarding the abatement of the appeal as against the

¶10

deceased party as soon as possible.

¶11

As such, the prescribed time to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2 as provided under Rules 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of abatement outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to take appropriate steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2, if any .

¶12

In turn, two weeks time is granted with direction to take appropriate steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2, if any on record. On failure, proceeding would stand abated against deceased Respondent No. 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.

¶13

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶14

sat-R(J-II)-11.09.2024

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Kolhapur v. Vinayak Annappa Yenchawandi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Kolhapur v. Vinayak Annappa Yenchawandi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through Divisional Manager Vs Jayashri Ramesh Deore and Ors.

Smt. Swati Rajendra Jagadale and Anr. Vs Girish Yahwant Solankurkar and Ors.

Mr.Satish Purushottam Bhagwat Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. through Mumbai Legal Hub, Mumbai

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Vishwanath Sitaram Patil and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited through Its Corporate Office vs Ku. Darshana Sandeep Surana (Applicant NO.1 Represented by Applicant NO.2 Since Minor)

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation, through Its Divisional Controller, Solapur vs Monali D/O Bharat Gaikwad and Anr.