Listing order: matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders to continue, pleadings to be filed, and matters assigned future dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADEDate: 2024.12.1110:57:30 +0530
Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
& ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :- 6th DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
before the next date.
| Serial Board |
Nos. of matters on the | To be listed on | To be listed in the category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 13/12/2024 | I.A. for order | |
| 31-64 | 13/12/2024 | I.A. for order | |
| 66-68 | 13/12/2024 | I.A. for order | |
| 69-71 | 11/02/2025 | Due admission | |
| 73-101 | 21/02/2025 | Due admission | |
| 103-127 | 24/02/2025 | Due admission |
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
