Disposed

Rujuta Mandar Thatte v. Forefront Private Liinited Formerly Known as Mesrss Forecront Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC4 Jul 2024IA/6658/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition and interim application in a second appeal were resolved through Consent Terms signed by the parties and their advocates. The Court accepted the undertakings, disposed of the interim application in terms of the settlement, and held that nothing survived in the contempt grievance.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rujuta Mandar Thatte vs Forefront Private Liinited Formerly Known as Mesrss Forecront Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2024.08.17 10:39:25 +0530

¶2

901-cp-73-2024-ia-6658-2024.doc

¶3

varsha

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6658 OF 2024

¶6

¶7

SECOND APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2021

¶8

WITH

¶9

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2024

¶10

¶11

SECOND APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2021

¶12

Rujuta Mandar Thatte and Ors … Petitioners/Applicants

¶13

vs.

¶14

Forefront Private Limited formerly known as Forefront Property Developers Pvt Ltd … Respondent

¶15

Mr. Pradeep Thorat a/w. Aditi Naikare for Petitioner in CP/73/24 and for Applicants in IA/6658/24.

¶16

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Mr. Aseem Naphade a/w. Ms. Kausar Banatwala i/b. Mr. Tushar Goradia, for Respondent.

¶17

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

¶18

DATED : 14^th AUGUST 2024

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

1. Learned counsels for the parties have tendered Consent

¶21

Terms dated 14^th August 2024. Consent Terms are signed by the Director of the Appellant and respondent nos. 1 and 2 in the Second

¶22

Page no. 1 of 3

¶23

901-cp-73-2024-ia-6658-2024.doc

¶24

Appeal. The Consent Terms are also signed by their respective advocates. The signatories to the Consent terms are present in the court. The signatories admit the terms and conditions of the Consent Terms as well as their signatures on the Consent Terms. The signatories are identified by their respective advocates.

¶25

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Board Resolution permitting the Director to sign the Consent Terms will be placed on record by 16^th August 2024. Learned advocate for the appellant is permitted to submit a copy of the Board Resolution to the Court Sheristedar on Friday i.e. on 16^th August 2024. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ with today’s date for identification.

¶26

The terms of the agreement between the parties as recorded

¶27

in the Consent Terms are legal and valid. Interim Application is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions submits that the post-dated cheques referred to in clause 7(a) and the allotment letter as referred in clause 7(e) shall be handed over to the learned advocate for the respondent by 16^th August 2024. Statement is accepted. Undertakings in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings to this Court. Parties will be entitled to get a certified copy of the

¶28

Page no. 2 of 3

¶29

901-cp-73-2024-ia-6658-2024.doc

¶30

Consent Terms.

¶31

Considering the agreement between the parties in the Consent Terms, learned counsels for the parties request that the Consent Terms may not be uploaded on the official website of the Bombay High Court and the same be kept in the Court record. In view of the request made on behalf of the parties, office is directed not to upload the Consent Terms.

¶32

In view of the settlement between the parties, nothing further survives in the grievance made in the contempt petition. Hence, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.

¶33

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶34

(GAURI GODSE, J.)

¶35

Page no. 3 of 3

Rujuta Mandar Thatte v. Forefront Private Liinited Formerly Known as Mesrss Forecront Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rujuta Mandar Thatte v. Forefront Private Liinited Formerly Known as Mesrss Forecront Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Axis Trustee Services Limited vs M.T. Prem Mala Imo No. 9209972

Vaishali Shriniwas Alageri vs Shrinivas Gurunath Alageri

Dnyaneshwar Soapn Shivrkar (Mali) and Others vs Baban Dashrath Shivarkar and Others

Ajanta Pharma Limited vs National Pharmaceuticals

Vasudeo v. Nemlekar Thr. P.O.A. Kochuputhenparampil Scaria James vs the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Thr. Assistant Municipal Commissioner K/West Ward

Mr. Bhupendra Onkarrao Lohkpure and Another vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another