Applicant in a pending writ petition sought expeditious hearing and withdrawal of deposited benefits, but counsel confined relief to expeditious hearing. Noting the petition was already admitted, the court directed it to be listed for final hearing in its own turn and dismissed the interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28 Ia-6519-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6519 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7099 OF 2018
Lata yashwant Sanap. ...Applicant. In the matter between : Bhairavnath Dyanan Prasarak Mandal and Another. ...Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra and Others. ...Respondents.
Mr. Satyajeet Chavan for the Petitioner. Ms. Savita Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : September 9, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Interim Application has been filed by the Respondent No. 4 seeking expeditious hearing of writ petition and for a direction to deposit the entire benefits and for permission to the Applicant to withdraw the said amount.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that he is confining the relief to only seeking expeditious hearing of the petition. Petition has already been admitted by order dated 18th July 2018. The same to come up for final hearing as per its own turn. Interim Application stands dismissed.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/09/2024 19:32:32
Lata Yashwant Sanap
Bhairavnath Dyanan Prasarak Mandal
State of Maharashtra
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
