Appeal dismissed as infructuous since the respondent corporation had already demolished the unauthorised structure. Pending application also disposed of.
Appeal and pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
8-ao-206-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.03.2817:10:02 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 206 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6426 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 206 OF 2024
Shaikh Abdul Rehman ..Appellant/Applicant Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Samir Sarambalkar i/b. J. S. Jamkhandi, for the Appellant / Applicant.
Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar, for the Respondent / MMC.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 28 MARCH 2024
P.C.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Shaikh Abdul Rehman
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
