This court granted leave to the appellants to withdraw the appeal. The court recommended that the trial court expedite the hearing due to the respondent being a senior citizen, while noting that it had not examined the merits.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.03.28 GONSALVES 10:07:30 +0530
14.ao250-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.250 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7090 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.250 OF 2024
Vilas Chalu Hodage And Another ...Appellants/Applicants vs. Hausabai Chalu Hodage And Others ...Respondents
Mr. Rupesh Shirke Padwal, for the Appellants.
Ms. Anita Murgude, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Santosh Jagtap, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 27 MARCH 2024
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2, on instructions, makes a statement that the respondents will not create third party interest till the conclusion of the suit pending before the trial court.
1 / 2
14.ao250-24.doc
sg
2 / 2
Vilas Chalu Hodage And Another
Hausabai Chalu Hodage And Others
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court