Criminal anticipatory bail applications were disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested and released on regular bail by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
36-ABA-2340-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2340 OF 2021
Sunil Kumar Sushil Kumar Nigam …. Applicant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2024.03.08 15:43:30 +0530
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.229 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2340 OF 2021
Preeti Jayesh Thakkar …. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents
Mr.Siddharth Jagushte i/b Mr.Akash Kavade, for the Applicant. Ms.G.S. Rao, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr.Revandkar, PSI, Byculla Police Station.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 7th MARCH 2024
P.C:-
. Heard.
during the pendency of this Application, the Applicant has
arrested and he is released on bail by the Regular Court as this
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2
36-ABA-2340-2021.doc
Application is become infructuous.
infructuous.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Sunil Kumar Sushil Kumar Nigam
The State of Maharashtra
Preeti Jayesh Thakkar
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
