Disposed

Mrs. Bhakti Sachin Mahadik v. Sachin Subhash Mahadik

Bombay HC12 Jul 2024IA/630/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application in a family court appeal concerning supervisory access to two minor daughters. The court modified its earlier order to adjust access schedules around school timings and accepted an undertaking for return of the appellant's belongings.

What did the court decide?

Access schedule modified per agreement; undertaking to return listed belongings within one week; matter adjourned to 12 July 2024.

Mrs. Bhakti Sachin Mahadik vs Sachin Subhash… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

9.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.630 OF 2024

¶4

¶5

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.)NO. 28875 OF 2023

¶6

Mrs. Bhakti S. Mahadik

.. Applicant/

Appellant

Versus

SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI

¶11

Digitally signed by SMITA RAJNIKANT JOSHI Date: 2024.06.25 10:10:02 +0530

¶12

Mr. Sachin S. Mahadik

¶13

.. Respondent.

¶14

Adv. Grishma Lad with Adv. Priyanka Yadav, Adv. Aishwarya Bapat and Shivangi Singh, for the Applicant/ Appellant.

¶15

Adv. Kunal M. Patel i/b. R. V. Sankpal & Associates, for Respondent.

¶16

CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JUNE 21, 2024

¶17

P. C.

¶18

In the above matter, this Court had passed an ad-interim Order on 3^rd May, 2024. By that order, an agreement was recorded between the parties that supervisory access of both minor children one – Miss. Tirtha, age 13 years and second – Miss Grantha, age 6 years, would be granted to the mother as more particularly set out in the said order.

¶19

S.R.JOSHI

¶20

9.doc

¶21

To put in nut a shell, it was agreed that the father shall arrange to send both children at the Children’s Complex of the Family Court, Thane on every first and third Saturday from 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. and shall arrange to collect the children from the said venue at 5.00 p.m.

¶22

Today, we are informed that since the schools have now started and the elder child has school in the afternoon and the younger child has school in the morning, the parties have agreed that the Respondent-father shall arrange to send the elder daughter Miss. Tirtha, age 13 years on every first Saturday from 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. at Children’s Complex of the Family Court, Thane and the younger daughter on every third Saturday from 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. at the Children’s Complex of the Family Court, Thane.

¶23

In the event, there is a fifth Saturday in any month, the Respondent-father and the Appellant-mother have agreed that access would be given of the elder daughter from 11.00 am to 1.00 pm at the Children’s Complex of the Family Court, Thane. The parties have further agreed that if for any reason, the 1^st Saturday and/or the 3^rd Saturday and/or the 5^th Saturday is a holiday from school and the Family Court at Thane is functioning, then access of both the children shall be given on that particular Saturday between 11.00 am to 1.00 pm.

¶24

Page 2 of 3 JUNE 21, 2024

¶25

S.R.JOSHI

¶26

9.doc

¶27

Only to this extent, our Order dated 3^rd May, 2024 stands modified.

¶28

The parties have further informed that there is a list of belongings of the Appellant which needs to be returned by the Respondent. That list has been tendered to us today in the Court. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶29

Both the parties have stated before the Court that the list is accurate and that belongings mentioned therein shall be handed over by the Respondent-Husband to the Appellant-Wife within a period of one week from today. We accept the said statement as an undertaking given to this Court.

¶30

We now place the above matter on board on 12^th July, 2024.

¶31

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶32

[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶33

Page 3 of 3 JUNE 21, 2024

¶34

S.R.JOSHI

Mrs. Bhakti Sachin Mahadik v. Sachin Subhash Mahadik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Bhakti Sachin Mahadik v. Sachin Subhash Mahadik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shivram Fakira Barde vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited through Its Selection Committee and Ors.

Sagar Bhagirath Karate vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Selection Committee and Ors.

Jayant Laxmikant Choupane vs Government of Maharashtra, Addl. Chief Secretary, Industry, Energy, Labour and Mining Dept. and Ors.

Lovejeet Bachitar Singh Sandhu vs Guruprit Kaur Pritpal Singh Khatri

Lovejeet Bachitar Singh Sandhu vs Guruprit Kaur Pritpal Singh Khatri

Vaishali Chandrakant Gangavane through R.C. More and 20 Ors. vs Nehru Nagar Ajinkyatara Chs Ltd. and 4 Ors.