Execution of an unsatisfied arbitral award directing joint and several payment with interest. Respondents, though served, did not appear. The court granted disclosure relief under Order XXI Rule 41 and Section 51 CPC, directing affidavits of assets within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920-IA-63-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.63 OF 2024 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO.30498 OF 2023
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED )...APPLICANT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED )...APPLICANT V/s. VINOD MEWADA S/O. PREM SINGH & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
Ms.Rahila Memon a/w. Ms.Nehal Deshmukh i/by S.I.Joshi & Co., Advocate for the Applicant.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 3rd APRIL 2024
P.C. :
avk 1/2
920-IA-63-2024.doc
therefore, seeks relief in terms of Prayer clauses (b) and (g), which read thus :
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 2/2
ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signed by ARTI VILAS KHATATE Date: 2024.04.03 20:37:06 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents to an unsatisfied arbitral award should be directed to file affidavits disclosing their properties and means under Order XXI Rule 41 and Section 51 CPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Vinod Mewada s/o. Prem Singh
Anr. (Second Respondent)
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
