The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed an interim application seeking an extension of time to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,40,000 partly already deposited, pursuant to an earlier order.
The extension of time as mentioned in clause (c) of the order dated 03/11/2023 is extended by a period of 4 weeks from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:6373
Urmila Ingale 501-ia-573-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 573 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 244 OF 2023
Mr. Sachin Chhaburao Jathar ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Chinmay Patil a/w Mr.Abhinav Tayade and Mr.Amit Pardeshi, for the applicant.
Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 08, 2024
P.C. :
the amount as directed by this Court vide order dated 03/11/2023. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions submitted that an amount of Rs.5,40,000/- in part compliance of the order dated 03/11/2023 has already been deposited.
that sufÏcient time has already been granted to the applicant during which time the applicant has failed to
1/2
Urmila Ingale 501-ia-573-24.doc
deposit the amount. Hence, the application be rejected.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 08/02/2024 19:41:20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be extended to deposit the amount directed by the order dated 03/11/2023.
Mr. Sachin Chhaburao Jathar
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
