Sapna Krishna Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications adjourned for paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Interim orders, if any, continued till 06/12/2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-959
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3988 OF 2024
Ganesh Vitthal Mane ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4651 OF 2024
In
Criminal Bail Appln. 3988 OF 2024
Sapna Krishna Jadhav ....PETITIONER V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 5th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ganesh Vitthal Mane
- petitioner
Sapna Krishna Jadhav
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Gayatri Hetal Construction Co. Pvt. Thr. Partner, Nagpur and Others Vs Bhartiya Gruha Samasya Niwaran Sanstha Ltd. Public Trust Thr. President, D.G. Gedam and Ors.
Gayatri Hetal Construction Co. Pvt. Thr. Partner, Nagpur and Others Vs Bhartiya Gruha Samasya Niwaran Sanstha Ltd. Public Trust Thr. President, D.G. Gedam and Ors.
Gayatri Hetal Construction Co. Pvt. Thr. Partner, Nagpur and Others Vs Bhartiya Gruha Samasya Niwaran Sanstha Ltd. Public Trust Thr. President, D. G. Gedam and Ors.
Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Market Yard, Apmc, Nagpur Thr. Chairman, Shri Ahmad Karim Bhai Sheikh Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Co-Operation, Marketing and Textile Dept., and Ors.