Vinita Balbir Verma v. Vipasha Agarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a writ petition was withdrawn as infructuous and disposed of with liberty to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-ASIA-4470-2023.DOC
Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date: 2024.01.04 18:50:58 +0530
Shivgan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4470 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8556 OF 2021
Vinita Balbir Verma …Applicant/ (Orig.R.No.3) IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Vipasha Agarwal ... Petitioner Versus
The Additional Commissioner Konkan Division, Mumbai & Ors. …Respondents
Mr Manal Dhanani , i/b Abhijeet C Mahadeokar, for the Applicant. Ms Preeti Madan , for Ms Yogini Ugale, for Original Respondent No.4.
CORAM: Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 4th January 2024
PC:-
1. Mr. Manal Dhanani, learned counsel for the Applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the interim application as the same has become infructuous. Liberty to withdraw is granted.
2. The interim application is disposed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 1 of 1
4th January 2024
Vipasha Agarwal
The Additional Commissioner Konkan Division, Mumbai & Ors.
Vinita Balbir Verma
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court