Master Nitishkumar Kantilal Shah through His Natural Guardian Shah Vs Vishnudas Gopal Tamore

¶1

5-ASCAW-2261-2018.DOC

¶2

2024:BHC-AS:440

¶3

Gaikwad RD

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2018

¶5

IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.4357 OF 1999

¶7

Master Nitishkumar Kantilal Shah Through his natural guardian Shah …Applicant In the Matter Between: Master Nitishkumar Kantilal Shah Through his natural guardian Shah …Petitioner Versus Vishnudas Gopal Tamore …Respondent

¶8

None for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.

¶9

CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 4^th January 2024

¶10

PC:-

¶11

1. None appears for the parties.

¶12

2. By an order dated 4^th July 2017, this Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution. The order records that the interim order granted by the Court was a conditional order wherein the Petitioner was directed to deposit rent/compensation and the

¶13

Page 1 of 2 4^th January 2024

¶14

5-ASCAW-2261-2018.DOC

¶15

Petitioner has neither deposited the same and nor even appeared in the darkhast proceedings.

¶16

3. The Petitioner has made this application seeking restoration of the writ petition on the ground that he was unable to contact his previous advocate and only after he engaged his present advocate, he learnt about the dismissal of the writ petition. He, thus, seeks restoration of the writ petition. There is also substantial delay in making the present restoration application as can be seen from the averments in the application.

¶17

4. Today, when the matter was called out none appear for the Applicant/Petitioner. This clearly shows disinterest and disregard of the Applicant/Petitioner in respect of Court proceedings. No reasons have been made out to justify either restoration of the writ petition or condonation of the delay for making the restoration application.

¶18

5. The application is, thus, dismissed.

¶19

(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)

¶20

Page 2 of 2 4^th January 2024

Master Nitishkumar Kantilal Shah through His Natural Guardian Shah v. Vishnudas Gopal Tamore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Master Nitishkumar Kantilal Shah through His Natural Guardian Shah v. Vishnudas Gopal Tamore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Bachai Pal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Jayant Sudhakar Kulkarni Vs Madhavi Jayant Kulkarni and Anr.

Abhayraj S/O Shankar Hanmante Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Vinita Balbir Verma Vs Vipasha Agarwal

Shri. Laxman Fakira Jondhale Decd through Lhrs Vs Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors.

M/S. Manohar and Company Vs Jayaben Jamnadas Davada and Anr.