Eknath Tukaram Sutar v. State of Maharashtra
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NISHA Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS SANDEEP Date: 2024.03.11 CHITNIS 13:05:31 +0530
8-ia.429.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.429 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.113 OF 2024
Eknath Tukaram Sutar ...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Eknath Tukaram Sutar ...Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Soniya S. Miskin, Appointed Advocate, for the Applicant.
Ms. A. S. Gotad, A.P.P for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 8th MARCH 2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Eknath Tukaram Sutar
- appellant
Eknath Tukaram Sutar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court