Disposed

Atmaram @ Ram Krishna Dalvi(Deceased) v. Sopan Krishna Dalvi(Deceased)

Bombay HC1 Aug 2024IA/426/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court admitted a second appeal on substantial questions of law regarding Order II Rule 2 CPC and burden of proof. The court condoned delay in bringing legal representatives on record and granted ad-interim stay on the suit property, directing parties not to create third-party interests.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim stay on suit property; delay in bringing LRs condoned; call for records.

Atmaram @ Ram Krishna Dalvi(Deceased) vs Sopan… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed VARSHA by VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURUDate: RAJGURU 2024.10.1912:24:53 +0530

¶2

11-sa-490-2022-ia-10200-2022.doc

¶3

varsha

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

SECOND APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2022

¶6

WITH

¶7

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10200 OF 2022

¶8

¶9

SECOND APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2022

¶10

Shri Atmaram @ Ramkrishna Dalve (D/H) Shantabai A. Dalve (D/H) Shantabai A. Dalvi (Deceased) Shri … Appellants/Applicants Machindra A. Dalvi and Ors

¶11

vs.

¶12

Shri Sopan Krishna Dalvi (since … Respondents deceased through Lrs) and Ors

¶13

WITH

¶14

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8343 OF 2024

¶15

¶16

SECOND APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2022

¶17

Nivrutti Krishna Dalvi … Applicant

¶18

IN THE MATTER

¶19

Shri Atmaram @ Ramkrishna Dalve (D/H) Shantabai A. Dalve (D/H) Shantabai A. Dalvi (Deceased) Shri Machindra A. Dalvi and Ors …. Appellant

¶20

vs.

¶21

Shri Sopan Krishna Dalvi (since deceased through Lrs) and Ors … Respondents

¶22

Ms. Poonam Bhosale for Appellants/Applicants.

¶23

Mr. Darshan Nagpure a/w. Ms. Anita Adsul and Ms. Sunita Nagpure for Applicant in IA/8348/24.

¶24

Mr. Arnold Thomas for Respondents.

¶25

Page no. 1 of 4

¶26

11-sa-490-2022-ia-10200-2022.doc

¶27

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 14^th OCTOBER 2024

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 426 of 2024

¶30

This application is for bringing on record the names of heirs and legal representatives of deceased sole respondent. There is a delay of 123 days in filing the application. The heirs and legal representatives are represented through advocate.

¶31

Learned advocate for the respondent does not oppose the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay.

¶32

I have perused the reasons stated in the application. The reasons mentioned in the application are acceptable and justifiable.

¶33

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses(b), (c) and (d). Amendment to be carried out within three weeks from today.

¶34

SECOND APPEAL NO. 490 OF 2022

¶35

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Second appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:

¶36

Page no. 2 of 4

¶37

11-sa-490-2022-ia-10200-2022.doc

¶38

I) Whether the burden on the point of Order II, Rule 2 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (‘ CPC ’) could have been casted upon the defendant, when admittedly earlier suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration and injunction was dismissed for not making any consequential relief of possession?

¶39

II) Whether the plaintiff was under obligation to produce the proceedings of the earlier suit and the judgment and decree of the earlier suit to point out that the present suit was on the fresh cause of action and there was no bar under Order II, Rule 2 of the CPC?

¶40

III) Whether the reasons recorded by the First Appellate Court are sustainable in law in the absence of the document being produced on record in earlier suit which was admittedly dismissed for not seeking any consequential relief of possession?

¶41

Learned advocate for all respondents waives notice.

¶42

Call for records and proceedings.

¶43

Printing is dispensed with.

¶44

Learned advocate for the appellants shall file private paper-

¶45

book within a period of one year from today.

¶46

Page no. 3 of 4

¶47

11-sa-490-2022-ia-10200-2022.doc

¶48

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10200 OF 2022

¶49

Rule on interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) is made returnable after 12 weeks. Respondents are at liberty to file affidavitin-reply before the next date.

¶50

Learned advocate for all respondents waives notice.

¶51

Till next date, there will be ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause(b).

¶52

During the pendency of the application, parties shall not create any third party interest in the suit property.

¶53

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8343 OF 2024

¶54

To be heard alongwith the second appeal.

¶55

(GAURI GODSE, J.)

¶56

Page no. 4 of 4

Atmaram @ Ram Krishna Dalvi(Deceased) v. Sopan Krishna Dalvi(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atmaram @ Ram Krishna Dalvi(Deceased) v. Sopan Krishna Dalvi(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mayuri Dipesh Nagla vs Dipesh Nagla

Shri Satish Rohodas Kolhe vs Sou Mita Satish Kolhe

Tejas Dilip Barmecha and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra through Chief G.P.

Bharat Lalu Bhai Jani and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr G.P and Ors.

Gopal Bajirao Ankusharao vs the State of Maharashtra

Bharat Lalu Bhai Jani and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr G.P and Ors.