Appellants sought leave to withdraw an appeal from an interlocutory order in a pending suit. The High Court permitted withdrawal, disposed of the pending interim application, and requested the trial court to decide the suit on its own merits within eight months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.04.26 GONSALVES 22:32:22 +0530
909.ao299-23.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 299 OF 2023
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3777 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 299 OF 2023
Mrs Bhavna Manoj Gayakvad And Others
...Appellants/Applicants
vs.
Smt Prabhavati Ramniklal Shah And Others ...Respondents
Mr Sandesh Patil, a/w. Mr Chintan Shah and Mr Pavan Patil, for the Appellants.
Mr Vijay Saini, Appellant No.39-in-person, present.
Mr Ravi Kadam, Senior Counsel, a/w. Mr Bhushan Dehsmukh and Mani Thevar, i/b. Ganesh & Co., for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
Mr Simil Purohit, a/w. Ms Disha Shetty and Mr Akshit Dedhia, i/b. Wadia Ghandy and Co., for Respondent Nos. 5 to 9.
Mr Mayuresh Lagu, for Respondent No.10.
Mr B.K. Raje, for Respondent Nos. 11 to 14.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 26 April 2024
P.C. :
. After hearing the matter for some time, the learned Counsel
1 / 2
909.ao299-23.doc
for the appellants, on instructions of the appellants, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. Leave granted as prayed for.
2 / 2
Mrs Bhavna Manoj Gayakvad And Others
Smt Prabhavati Ramniklal Shah And Others
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
