One-line procedural order: a delay of 699 days in filing an application was condoned, amendment was directed within two weeks, and the pending appeal from order was listed for a later date. Decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.04.27 Chitra Sonawane. 1 21:20:15 12-AO-395-2014.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Interim Application No.1076 of 2024
in
Appeal from Order No.386 of 2014
Smt Bhagirathibai Bapu Sadole & Ors. ... Appellants. Versus Sharad Ramchandra Patil (deceased) through Lrs Jayashree Sharad Patil & Ors. … Respondents.
Mr Kedar Lad i/by PD Dalvi for appellants (through VC)
Ms Stefy Dias i/by Umesh Mankapure for respondents.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 26 April 2024.
P.C. :
Interim Application No.1076 of 2024:
This is an application for condonation of delay of 699 days in filing the present application. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the delay stands condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
Chitra Sonawane. 2 12-AO-395-2014.doc
Appeal from Order No.386 of 2014:
List this appeal on 25 June 2024.
[ R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Smt Bhagirathibai Bapu Sadole & Ors.
Jayashree Sharad Patil & Ors. (Lrs of Sharad Ramchandra Patil (deceased))
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
