Nandakumar Sarjerao Gote and Anr. v. Tatyaba Bhauso Paigude and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Writ Petition No. 2116 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 3524 of 2024, decided 17 October 2024 (G. S. Kulkarni & Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, JJ.; order signed by Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, J.) — Paigude v. State of Maharashtra: challenge to freezing of petitioners' bank account and withdrawal of Rs. 2.67 crores by SDO/SLAO after payment of Rs. 9.50 crores land acquisition compensation, possession of land allegedly taken over; MSRDP/MSRDC impleaded on amendment; SDO's reply affidavit directed on jurisdiction and power to freeze account and withdraw compensation; ad-interim order of 14.03.2024 continued to 14.11.2024; purely interlocutory, no precedent on merits.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory directions only: MSRDC impleaded as added respondent with notice; SDO directed to file reply affidavit on jurisdiction to freeze account and withdraw compensation; ad-interim order of 14 March 2024 continued till 14 November 2024