Manik Ramchandra Birla v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application listed for procedural directions; intervenor granted time to file affidavit-in-reply after service of the application. Ad-interim relief continued till next date. No substantive adjudication on the bail application.
What did the court decide?
Service of copy within two weeks; intervenor may file affidavit-in-reply in four weeks; ad-interim relief to continue until 21.11.2024.
What the court decided
22-ABA-595-24.odt
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.595 OF 2024
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3520 OF 2024 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.595 OF 2024
Dr. Mahesh Shripad Kotbagi …..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Meghdeep M. Oak, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt Sangita D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. V.K. Bajpai, Advocate for the Intervenor.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
- Learned counsel for the first informant states that
copy of the Application be served on him. Learned counsel for the Applicant undertakes to serve a copy to the learned counsel for the intervenor within a period of two weeks from today. Learned counsel for the intervenor seeks at least four
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dr. Mahesh Shripad Kotbagi
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Sarang V. Kotwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nirvaana Construction LLP vs Sagar Kiran Co-Operative Housing Society Limited
Deepak Ramdas Pednekar through General Secretary of Union vs Haffkine Bio Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd.
Ramkumar Sambhuram Chourasia vs Mahednra Kalyankar ,the Chief Executive Officer
Hdfc Bank Limited vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II