An interim application seeking restoration of a dismissed writ petition is condoned for delay subject to payment of Rs.5,000/-, and the application is allowed.
Condonation of delay and allowance of the application for restoration of the Writ Petition subject to payment of cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 40-ia3352.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3352 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2846 OF 2022
Manish Motiram Hage
…..Applicant
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
…..Respondents
Adv. Ajinkya Sarvade i/by Adv. Pankaj Purway for the Applicant. Smt. Anamika Malhotra Addl. PP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
P.C.:-
eloquent. However, at the profused request of the learned Advocate for the Applicant and on the statement that, for condonation of delay the Applicant is ready and willing to pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- to Kirtikar Law Library, High Court, Mumbai within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of
1/2
ssm 40-ia3352.2024.doc
the Order on the official website of Bombay High Court, we are inclined to
condone delay.
is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.09.21 13:59:52 +0530
2/2
Manish Motiram Hage
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
