Manoaj Nautamlal Shah v. Dev Land and Housing Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration petition seeking extension of time; the court, prima facie unsatisfied with grounds for extension, permitted the petitioner to file an additional affidavit and adjourned the matter for further hearing.
What the court decided
1-ARBP-31-2024.DOC
Arun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 31 OF 2024
Manoj Nautamlal Shah …Petitioner
Versus
Dev Land And Housing Ltd …Respondent
Mr Aditya Shiralkar , with Vijay Poojari, i/b Shiralkar & Co, for the Petitioner.
Mr Prathamesh Kamat , with Nishant C, Nivit Srivastava & Sneha Patil, i/b Maniar Srivastava Associates, for the Respondent.
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 6th September 2024
PC:-
- After this matter was extensively argued and I have prima facie indicated that I was not satisfied with the grounds made out for extension of time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Nautamlal Shah
- respondent
Dev Land And Housing Ltd
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court