Interim application in a criminal appeal. A legal aid advocate from the High Court Legal Services Committee was appointed for respondent No.2, with directions to serve papers and the matter was adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-IA-3186-2024.doc
Digitally signed by RUPALI RUPALI RAJESHWAKODIKAR RAJESHWAKODIKAR Date:2024.12.20 16:02:33 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3186 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 864 OF 2024
Sanehi Shrikisan Gaud ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Trushna Shah a/w Mr. Tejas Dande, Mr. Bharat Gadhavi, Mr. Vinayak Shelar, Mr. Sharvesh Deshpande, Ms. Manshi Dande, Mr. Vishal Navale & Mr. Aniket Shitole for the Applicant.
Dr. Ashwini A. Takalkar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
PI – Mr. Jayant Gadekar attached to EOW, Unit -06, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 20th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
No.2’s father is present and that he wants an Advocate from the High
Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai, to espouse the cause of the
1/2
Wakodikar
20-IA-3186-2024.doc
respondent No.2.
of Panel Lawyers of the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai, to espouse the cause of the respondent No.2.
M.M.SATHAYE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
Wakodikar
Sanehi Shrikisan Gaud
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
REVATI MOHITE DERE
M.M.SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
