In an interim application, the applicant sought an extension of time to furnish bail surety. While observing that sufficient time had already been granted, the Court allowed an extension as a last chance.
Extension of time to furnish surety granted until four weeks from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923_IA_3182_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3182 OF 2024 IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2189 OF 2022
| Saddam Chappan Shah | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
Mr. Rohit H. Mishra for applicant.
Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2024
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. By this application, the applicant seeks extension of time to furnish surety, in terms of order dated 08.04.2024, whereby this Court allowed the bail application of the applicant. In the said order, the applicant was permitted to furnish cash bail surety for a period of 6 weeks, in lieu of surety.
(MANISH PITALE, J)
PRIYA Priya Kambli Digitallysigned byPRIYAKAMBLI KAMBLI Date:2024.08.2818:54:55+0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves an extension of time to furnish surety for bail.
Saddam Chappan Shah
State of Maharashtra
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
