Applicant sought anticipatory bail in a bank cheating FIR alleging loans obtained on fake gold jewellery deposited in connivance with the bank's gold valuer. The court found statements on record indicated prima facie conspiracy and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
909-aba-2230.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2230 OF 2024
Mubarak Jainoddin Shaikh … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Yuvraj Tajane for the Applicant. Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 27th AUGUST 2024
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.
2
bipin prithiani
909-aba-2230.24.doc
while obtaining huge amounts of loan. As per the statement of the informant, leading to registration of the FIR, the applicant deposited a purported gold chain and was granted loan of Rs.1,66,000/-.
3
bipin prithiani
909-aba-2230.24.doc
statement of the informant, leading to registration of the FIR, makes specific allegation against the gold valuer of the bank and various accused persons, including the applicant. Details are given about the jewellery deposited by each accused persons, posing it to be genuine gold jewellery, when subsequently such jewellery was found to be fake. The statements on record do indicate a link between the accused persons, prima facie indicating a conspiracy hatched by the gold valuer of the bank along with other accused to dupe the bank of huge amounts of money.
MANISH PITALE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant accused of cheating a bank by depositing fake gold jewellery to obtain loans.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mubarak Jainoddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
