Allowed

Rajesh Hirji Chheda v. Bina Rajesh Chheda (Deceased)

Bombay HC13 Nov 2024IA/3050/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an interim application to amend the Schedule of Properties in a testamentary petition. The amendment corrected a flat number and included two properties omitted post-grant, supported by filed affidavits and documents.

What did the court decide?

The interim application was allowed; the applicant was directed to carry out the necessary amendment within six weeks and post-amendment grant to be expedited.

Rajesh Hirji Chheda vs Bina Rajesh Chheda (Deceased) — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

18-ia-3050-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3050 OF 2024 IN

¶4

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.784 OF 2021

¶5

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR

¶6

Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.11.14 09:51:10 +0530

¶7

Rajesh Hirji Chheda ...Applicant vs. Bina Rajesh Chheda ...Deceased

¶8

Mr. Amey Sawant i/b. Mr. J.J. Thakkar, for the Applicant.

¶9

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 13, 2024

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks

¶13

leave to amend the Schedule of Amendment (Exhibit B to the application) so as to correct the number of the flat proposed to be added by way of amendment from Flat No. 1201 to Flat No. 1202.

¶14

Leave granted.

¶15

Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶16

Re-verification dispensed with.

¶17

This application is preferred for post grant amendment in the

¶18

Probate and last Will and Testament granted by an order dated 20^th

¶19

August, 2021. In the application it is averred that post grant, it was

¶20

realized that two of the properties were not included in the Schedule of Properties (Schedule I) appended to the petition.

Vishal Parekar, PS

...1

18-ia-3050-2024.doc

By an order dated 9^th October, 2024, the petitioner was directed to file the additional affidavit to place on record the documents to substantiate the claim. The petitioner has filed additional affidavit. Copies of the agreement for sale in respect of Flat No. 1202 and share certificate issued by Induvilla Co-Operative Housing Limited, Mumbai in the name of the deceased are annexed to the additional affidavit. Copy of the RC book is also filed. The claim of the applicant for the amendment thus finds support in the additional affidavit and the documents annexed thereto. I do not find any impediment in allowing the application.

¶25

Hence, the following order.

¶26

ORDER

¶27

1] Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer

¶28

clause (b).

¶29

2] Necessary amendment in the Schedule of Properties (Schedule I) be carried out in accordance with the Schedule of

¶30

Amendment (Exhibit B) as amended pursuant to this order within a period of six weeks.

¶31

3] Post amendment grant expedited.

¶32

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)

¶33

Vishal Parekar, PS

¶34

...2

Rajesh Hirji Chheda v. Bina Rajesh Chheda (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Hirji Chheda v. Bina Rajesh Chheda (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kalpana Parshuram Argile vs Parshuraam Dashrath Argile (Deceased)

Khorshed Burjis Vesuna vs Perviz Jehangirji Engineer (Deceased)

Carlos Joseph Noronha vs Late Crispina Noronha (Deceased)

Ashwani Kumar Alias Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs Sohan Lal Sharma Alias Sohan Sharma (Deceased)

Anushka Anup Mirlekar Nee Aparna Prakash Vagal vs Prakash Dattatray Vagal

Bhupendra Dalal Vs the Custodian