Disposed

J M Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. v. Sandip Narasinha Payas

Bombay HC30 Jul 2024IA/2826/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim applications seeking withdrawal of fine amounts deposited with the JMFC Pune in two summary cases, pending revision applications. The court permitted the complainant-applicant to withdraw Rs. 11,80,000 and Rs. 3,00,000 on furnishing undertakings to return the amounts with interest if directed.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Rs. 11,80,000 and Rs. 3,00,000 from JMFC Pune on undertaking to return amounts with interest if directed.

J M Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. vs Sandip Narasinha Payas — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IA. 2826 of 2024doc.doc

¶2

2024:BHC-AS:37224

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2826 OF 2024 IN

¶5

REVISION APPLICATION NO. 417 OF 2018

¶6

ALONGWITH

¶7

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2827 OF 2024

¶8

¶9

REVISION APPLICATION NO. 414 OF 2018

¶10

J. M. Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. ...Applicant/Complainant

¶11

In the matter between

¶12

Sandip Narasinha Payas

¶13

...Applicant

¶14

vs.

¶15

J. M. Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. and Anr.

¶16

...Respondent

¶17

*****

¶18

Apoorv Srivastava a/w Tanvir K.	Advocate for the Applicant
Omkar Nagwekar i/by P. R. Arjunwadkar	Advocate for the Respondents in Revision
Ms. S. E. Phad	APP for the Respondent-State

¶19

¶20

CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

¶21

DATE : 18^th SEPTEMBER 2024

¶22

P. C. :-

¶23

Heard learned Advocate for the Complainant-Applicant.

¶24

1/3

¶25

Seema

¶26

IA. 2826 of 2024doc.doc

¶27

It is true that learned Advocate Mr. Arjunwadkar appeared in both these applications.

¶28

On 30.07.2024 direction was given to his client to furnish new address. Thereafter, matter was listed on 03.09.2024. On behalf of learned Advocate Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned Advocate Shri Omkar Nagvekar appeared and assured that new address will be furnished on the next date and direction was given either Mr. Arjunwadkar may argue through Video Conferencing or Mr. Omkar Nagvekar can argue the matter.

¶29

Today Mr. Omkar Nagvekar submitted that Mr. Arjunwadkar has already given NOC to his client. However, there is nothing on record seeking discharge. He can do so by writing a letter and producing the documents.

¶30

The facts and circumstances warrants me to decide both these interim applications. I am permitting to the Applicant-Complainant to withdraw the amount.

¶31

In Revision Application No. 414 of 2018, the Court of the JMFC imposed fine of Rs. 12,00,000/- and the Complainant is to be paid Rs. 11,80,000/-. This was confirmed by the Appellate Court on 29.06.2018.

¶32

2/3

¶33

Seema

¶34

IA. 2826 of 2024doc.doc

¶35

Whereas in Revision Application No. 417 of 2018, the Court of the JMFC, Pune has imposed fine of Rs. 3,00,000/- and entire amount is to be paid to the Complainant. This is confirmed by the Appellate Court on 29.06.2018.

¶36

On an undertaking, the amount can be permitted to be withdrawn. Hence, the Order:-

¶37

ORDER

¶38

(i) The Applicant-Complainant is permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs. 11,80,000/- (Rs. Eleven Lakhs Eighty Thousand only) in Summary Case No. 29354 of 2010 from the Court of JMFC Pune on furnishing an undertaking that amount will be returned alongwith interest, if directed by this Court.

¶39

(ii) Applicant-Complainant is further permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs) deposited in summary case no. 29355 of 2010 on furnishing an undertaking that amount will be returned alongwith interest, if directed by this Court.

¶40

Both these interim applications are disposed of.

¶41

Both these revision applications be listed on 13^th November

¶42

2024 .

¶43

Signed by: Seema Yelkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Seema Date: 20/09/2024 12:43:33

¶44

3/3

J M Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. v. Sandip Narasinha Payas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J M Mehta Travels and Tours and Co. v. Sandip Narasinha Payas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mrs. Shazia Fahed Shaikh Nee Shazia Rashid Khan vs Fahed Abdul Hameed Shaikh

State of Maharashtra vs Umaimma Chitalwala

Mrs. Shazia Fahed Shaikh Nee Shazia Rashid Khan W/O Mr. Fahed Abdul Hameed Shaikh vs Mr. Fahed Abdul Hameed Shaikh Husband of Mrs. Shazia Fahed Shaikh

Raghunath Krishna Gujar Since Decd Thru Lhrs and Lrs vs Suresh Krishna Gujar Since Decd Thru Lhrs and Lrs and Ors.

Makbul Shekusab Nigeban Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. through Its Mumbai Regional Office-Ii vs Mrs. Suvarna Arun Kore and Anr.