Application to restore a suit rejected by the Prothonotary & Senior Master for non-removal of office objections was allowed on grounds of sufficient cause; the plaintiff then withdrew the suit, which was dismissed as withdrawn, with interim orders vacated and court-fee refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-IA-2783-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2783 OF 2024
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 334 OF 2020
Anil Meghraj Gehi …Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Anil Meghraj Gehi …Plaintiff
Versus
The Collector of Stamps Mumbai City & Ors …Defendants
Ms Duraiya S Retiwala , with Tasneem S Tohfapharosh, Tasneem S Vohra & Arwa A Lokat, for the Applicant.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.10.03 11:19:30 +0530
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 1st October 2024
PC:-
Page 1 of 2
6-IA-2783-2024.DOC
remained was to attach the receipts issued by official translator and it was thus the Suit came to be dismissed.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause existed to restore a suit rejected under Rule 986 for non-removal of office objections?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anil Meghraj Gehi
The Collector of Stamps Mumbai City & Ors
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
