Directed that the present interim application for restoration of a previously dismissed criminal application is within the period of limitation and allowed the prayer clause.
The application for restoration of Criminal Application No.690 of 2024 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RVC 48 Ia-2748-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2748 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 690 OF 2024
Raghunath Rajaram Desai
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
Mr. Rajesh S. Sonar for Applicant.
Mr. Ajay Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 3rd September 2024.
P.C. :
No.690 of 2024, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by Order dated 27th June 2024.
of prayer clause (a).
( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
RAJESH Digitally signed byRAJESH VASANT VASANT CHITTEWAN CHITTEWAN Date: 2024.09.0618:41:25 +0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application for restoration of the Criminal Application is within the period of limitation.
Raghunath Rajaram Desai
The State of Maharashtra
Dr. Neela Gokale
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
