The High Court of Bombay at the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction could not hear the criminal interim application because the Registry had not yet placed the documents before it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by RUPALI RUPALI RAJESH RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2024.02.07 11:01:26 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2023
Rajni Amarlal Ramrakhiani ...Applicant Versus The Investigating Officer Through Senior Police Inspector ...Respondent
Mr. Amarlal H. Ramrakhiani i/b Mr. Vaibhav P. Shinde, for the Applicant.
Mr. V.B.Konde Deshmukh, Addl.P.P for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam a/w Mr. Hemant Patil i/b Mr. Prashant Raul, for the Intervenor.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :
before us, we are unable to hear the said application.
1/2
Wakodikar
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
Wakodikar
Rajni Amarlal Ramrakhiani
The Investigating Officer Through Senior Police Inspector
REVATI MOHITE DERE
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
