Rajendra Maruti Satam v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, directed to continue till the next date.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, to continue till 05/09/2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2665 OF 2024
Rajendra Maruti Satam ....APPLICANT V/S
The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2504 OF 2024
In
Criminal Bail Appln. 2665 OF 2024
Rajendra Maruti Satam ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 28th August, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 05/09/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajendra Maruti Satam
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Chief Executive Officer, Zp, Nagpur Vs Charandas Bidur Bakasare Died Thr. Lrs Parobai C Bakasare
Shrikrushna Sampatrao Saratkar and Others Vs Shri Ganpati Mandir Sansthan, Kandali, Thr. Its President/Panchkameti and Others
Jagdishprasad Bhagwandin Choudhary and Others vs Shrikrishna Narayanrao Pande and Others
Yogesh Prakash Thorat vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.