Allowed

Janardhan Arvind Parulekar v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Feb 2024IA/248/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court modified an interim bail condition by reducing the required surety amount from Rs.10,00,000/- to Rs.1,00,00,000/-. This decision aligns with a parallel order passed by a fellow Single Judge in a similar bail application involving the same applicant.

What did the court decide?

The clause demanding a surety of Rs.10,00,000/- is modified to require a surety of Rs.1,00,000/-.

Janardhan Arvind Parulekar Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

923-IA-248-2024.doc

¶2

Arjun

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.248 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.1991 OF 2023

¶5

Janardhan Arvind Parulekar …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

¶6

Mr. Bhavin Doshi a/w Pankaj Jain i/b P. D. Jain & Co., for the Applicant.

¶7

Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP, for the Respondent-State.

¶8

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2024

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. By this Interim Application the Applicant is seeking modification of Condition mentioned in Clause No.(b) of the Order dated 4th September 2023 passed by a learned Single Judge in Bail Application No.1990 of 2023. The said Clause No.(b), reads as under:

¶11

“(b) The applicant-Janardhan Arvind Parulekar in connection with C.R. No.374 of 2017 with Sadar Bazar Police Station, Solapur, shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.10,00,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.”

¶12

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant has relied on

¶13

¶14

923-IA-248-2024.doc

¶15

the Order dated 22nd January 2024 passed by a learned Single Judge (Coram: Sanjay A. Deshmukh, J) of this Court (Aurangabad Bench) in the case of Janardhan Arvind Parulekar v. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Application No.293 of 2024. In a similar case, the learned Judge has modified the bail Condition. The operative portion of the said Order dated 22nd January 2024 of a learned Single Judge, is as follows :-

¶16

“ O R D E R

¶17

I. The application is partly allowed.

¶18

II. The applicant be released on bail, in connection with Crime No.137 of 2016 registered with Osmanpura Police Station, Dist. Aurangabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh) with one surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh).

¶19

7 It is clarified that the applicant has to furnish P.R. bond of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh Only) and surety of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only).”

¶20

3. Learned APP opposes the Interim Application. However, as learned Single Judge by said Order dated 22nd January 2024 in another Application of the same Applicant has modified the

¶21

¶22

923-IA-248-2024.doc

¶23

similar Condition as contained in Clause No.(b) of the Bail Order dated 4th September 2023 passed by a learned Single Judge in Bail Application No.1990 of 2023, the same is modified by directing that instead of Rs.10,00,000/- of surety amount the same be Rs.1,00,000/-.

¶24

4. Accordingly, the said Clause No.(b) is modified as follows:The applicant-Janardhan Arvind Parulekar in connection with CR. No.374 of 2017 with Sadar Bazar Police Station, Solapur, shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) with one or more sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only).

¶25

5. Accordingly, the Interim Application is disposed of in above terms.

¶26

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶27

Janardhan Arvind Parulekar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardhan Arvind Parulekar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh @ Nandu Shankar Salve Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anant Dattu Patil Vs State of Maharashtra

Arjun Valuji Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra

Santosh Balu Dalavi Vs State of Maharashtra

Dayanand Rajendra Londhe Vs State of Maharashtra

Mohd Issak Suleman Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra