Mohd Issak Suleman Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application disposed of for non-prosecution as the applicant did not appear in either session and no one represented him.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-BA-497-20234.DOC
Sonali
2024:BHC-AS:5750
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.497 OF 2024
Mohd. Issac Suleman Shaikh…Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra…Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Ram Kundgir, P.S.I. attached to Virar Police Station present.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 6th FEBRUARY 2024
PC:-
1.In the Morning Session, none appeared for the Applicant and
therefore, Criminal Bail Application was kept in the Afternoon
Session. In the Afternoon Session also none appears for the
Applicant.
2.Ms. Shinde, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State
submits that the Applicant was arrested on 22nd December 2023,
the investigation is still going on and Charge-sheet is not yet filed.
Page 1 of 2
907-BA-497-20234.DOC
Sonali
It appears that the Applicant is not interested in prosecuting the
Criminal Bail Application.
3. Accordingly, the Criminal Bail Application is disposed of for non-prosecution.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
Signed by: Sonali Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/02/2024 17:12:39
Page 2 of 2
Mohd. Issac Suleman Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court