Disposed

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Surekha Ramesh Raut and Anr.

Bombay HC27 Feb 2024IA/2085/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Registrar, after the applicant failed to supply copies despite an initial four-week extension, granted a final two-week opportunity to comply. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the interim applications.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to supply necessary copies. Applications to be dismissed if copies are not supplied within this time.

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2084 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2085 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 35474 OF 2023

¶3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 26/06/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as

¶10

provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, both the Interim Applications would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-26.06.2024

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Surekha Ramesh Raut and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Surekha Ramesh Raut and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Trimurti Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit Jaysinghpur vs Smt. Laxmibai Parshuram Mule (Deceased) Thr Lrs.

M/S.Varad Developer Thr. Partner Sanjay Chandrakant Chauhan vs Mohan S. Mane (Deceased)(Thr. Lrs. Nila Mohan Mane and Others

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai vs Akshay Sudhakar Kawle and Anr.

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs Surekha Ramesh Raut and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra through the Special Land Acquisition Officer Raigad Vs Shankuntala Kantilal Modi

Tata Aig General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs Ramdas Hiraman Thakare and Anr.