Micron Housing LLP v. Joy Garai and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit seeking declaration that consent terms compromising a specific-performance suit are void, as Plaintiff is registered owner of the Juhu land via a 2016 conveyance. Court granted ad interim relief staying the consent terms and order, restraining Defendants 1 to 5, and directing status quo until next hearing.
What did the court decide?
Ad interim order in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (d): stay of consent terms dated 22 December 2023 and order thereon, injunction against Defendants 1 to 5, and status quo over the subject property ti
What the court decided
1 36-IA-2028-2024.doc
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.07.24 14:21:15 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2028 OF 2024
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 21494 of 2024
Micron Housing LLP ...Applicant In the matter between Micron Housing LLP ...Plaintiff Vs. Joy Garai & Ors. ...Defendants
Mr. Prathamesh Kamat a/w Nakul Jain, Sneha Patil i/by Maniar Srivastava Associates Advocates for the Applicant/Plaintiff.
Mr. Taher Rangwala a/w Shweta Rathod i/by Elixir Legal Services for Defendant No.3.
Mr. Mohit Jadhav, Addl.GP for Defendant Nos.6 and 7.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 22nd JULY, 2024
P.C.:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether ad interim relief should restrain Defendants 1 to 5 from acting on consent terms dated 22 December 2023 allegedly executed in fraud and contrary to an existing status quo order.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Micron Housing LLP
- petitioner
Micron Housing LLP
- respondent
Joy Garai
- respondent
Ors. (Defendant Nos.2 to 7)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court