Interim application seeking amendment of a pending writ petition was allowed in the interest of justice, with liberty to respondents to file affidavits-in-reply to both the amended and original petition; ad interim relief continued till the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Arjun
51-WP-2489-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2489 OF 2024
Raj Bhojwani & Ors. …Petitioners Versus The Learned Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. …Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.199 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2489 OF 2024
Raj Bhojwani & Ors. …Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Raj Bhojwani & Ors. …Petitioners Versus The Learned Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. …Respondents
Ankit Lohia a/w Mr. Ishvendra Tiwari i/b Sonal Doshi & Co., for the Petitioners/Applicants.
N. N. Bhadrashete i/b Priyanka N. Bhadrashete, for Resp. Nos.3 to 7. Javer N. Mamniya, for Respondent No.8.
Mayur Khandeparkar i/b Arjun Lingalod, for Respondent Nos.9 to 13. Mohit Jadhav, Addl. G.P., for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 24 JUNE 2024
P. C.:
Petition in terms of the Schedule annexed to the Interim Application.
1
Arjun 51-WP-2489-2024.doc
states that with respect to some orders which are sought to be challenged by way of amendment, there is an alternate remedy available. However, that point can be raised in the Affidavit-in-Reply of the Respondent or also can be raised at the time of hearing of the Writ Petition for admission.
terms:
2
Arjun 51-WP-2489-2024.doc
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
3
Raj Bhojwani & Ors.
The Learned Divisional Joint Registrar
Respondent Nos.3 to 7
Respondent No.8
Respondent Nos.9 to 13
Respondent Nos.1 & 2
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
