The High Court allowed an interim application for condonation of a 3-day delay in filing a second appeal. Considering the uncontroverted averments and the limited delay, the court held that sufficient cause is made out and granted the application.
Interim application for condonation of 3 days delay is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23(1) IA-1900-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1900 OF 2019
IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 27787 OF 2019
Navnath Vithal Manjare And Anr. …Applicants/
…Appellants
Versus
Arjun Rama Mali And Anr. …Respondents
*****
Mr. Rohan P. Surve, for Applicant.
Mr. Pranali P. Railkar i/b. Ajay A. Joshi, for Respondent No.1.
*****
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 13th FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF Date: 2024.02.15 10:12:44 +0530
.This is an application for Condonation of Delay of 3 days in
filing second appeal. Heard learned counsel for the Applicants and
learned counsel for Respondent No.1. Respondent No. 2 is duly
served. Nobody appears for Respondent No.2. No reply is filed.
2. Considering the extent of delay and un-controverted averments in the application, sufficient cause is made out. Hence, interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay is condoned.
3. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Husen
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of a 3-day delay in filing the second appeal.
Navnath Vithal Manjare
Arjun Rama Mali
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court