Application for condonation of 60 days' delay in filing a second appeal. Respondents were served but filed no reply. The court found sufficient cause in the uncontroverted averments and allowed the application.
60 days' delay in filing the appeal condoned; application allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 CAS-387-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2020
IN
SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 1368 OF 2019
Shri. Yusufkhan Kamruddin Khatib and Anr.…Applicants/
…Appellants
Versus
Shri. Fatthekhan Ghudulal Bhaldar And Anr.…Respondents
*****
Ms. Sejal A. Hariya i/b. Padmanabh D. Pise, for
Applicants/Appellants.
None for the Respondents.
Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF Date: 2024.02.14 13:17:26 +0530
*****
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
.Heard learned counsel for the Applicants. This is an application
for Condontion of Delay of 60 days in filing the appeal. Office note
shows that both the Respondents are served. No reply is filed till
date.
2. Considering the extent of delay and averments made in the application which are uncontroverted, sufficient cause is made out. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Delay is condoned.
3. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Husen
Yusufkhan Kamruddin Khatib and Anr.
Fatthekhan Ghudulal Bhaldar And Anr.
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court