Allowed

Snehal Natvarlal Muzoomdar v. Natvarlal Vavabhavi Muzoomdar

Bombay HC31 Jul 2024IA/1840/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Post-grant amendment application to correct clerical errors in the description of shareholdings in Schedule 1 of a Letters of Administration granted in respect of the deceased's estate. The court allowed leave to amend, permitted filing of the Schedule of Amendment, and expedited the post-amendment grant.

What did the court decide?

Application for post-grant amendment allowed; Schedule of Amendment to be filed and incorporated; re-verification dispensed with; post-amendment grant expedited.

Snehal Natvarlal Muzoomdar vs Natvarlal Vavabhavi… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

25-ia-1840-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1840 OF 2024 IN

¶4

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.4246 OF 2022

¶5

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR

¶6

Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.10.03 18:25:43 +0530

¶7

Snehal Natvarlal Muzoomdar ...Applicant vs. Natvarlal Vavabhai Muzoomdar ...Deceased

¶8

Mr. R. Jagdale i/b. Mr. Saahil Memon, for the Applicant.

¶9

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : OCTOBER 01, 2024

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

This is an application for post grant amendment in Letters of

¶13

Administration to the property and credits of Natvarlal Vavabhai

¶14

Muzoomdar (the deceased) granted by an order dated 8^th August, 2023.

¶15

At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks

¶16

leave to amend the application so as to annex the Schedule of Amendment.

¶17

Leave granted.

¶18

Schedule of Amendment be filed by 3^rd October, 2024.

¶19

Re-verification dispensed with.

¶20

In the application, it is averred that, in the description of the

¶21

property in Schedule 1, there have been inadvertent errors in the

Vishal Parekar

...1

25-ia-1840-2024.doc

number of shares, the distinctive share numbers and share certificate number.

¶26

I have perused the averments in paragraph 4 of the application.

¶27

The proposed amendment is essentially in the nature of correction of clerical errors in furnishing the correct description of the property at item No. 2 and 2(p) of the Schedule of Assets. I do not find any impediment in allowing the application.

¶28

Hence, the following order.

¶29

ORDER

¶30

1] The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶31

2] Necessary amendment in accordance with the Schedule of Amendment (to be filed by the applicant pursuant to this order) be carried out in the Schedule 1 of the petition.

¶32

3] Post amendment grant expedited.

¶33

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)

¶34

Vishal Parekar

¶35

...2

Snehal Natvarlal Muzoomdar v. Natvarlal Vavabhavi Muzoomdar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Snehal Natvarlal Muzoomdar v. Natvarlal Vavabhavi Muzoomdar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Durgadas Vaikunth Kasbekar vs Madhukar Shantaram Kasbekar(Decesed)

Pramod Anant Sawant vs Nalinkumar Mohanbhai Patel (Deceased)

Pramod Anant Sawant vs Daya Nalinkumar Patel (Deceased)

Savita Pandurang Aher vs Pandurang Damodar Aher (Deceased)

Anand Mahadev Jadhav vs Mahadev Gangaram Jadhav Alias M G Jadhav (Deceased)

Tejaswini Gangaram Thorat Alias Tejaswini Gangadhar Thorat vs Gangadhar Ramchandra Thorat Alias Gangaram Ramchandra Thorat (Deceased)