Disposed
Shradha Satish Shinde v. Satish Vithal Shinde
Bombay HCIA/18175/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI GAJANAN GAJANAN PALKARDate: PALKAR 2024.02.20 15:07:18 +0530 10.IA.18175.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18175 OF 2022 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.17218 OF 2022
Smt. Shradha Satish Shinde …Applicant
Versus
Mr. Satish Vithal Shinde …Respondent
Ms Rachana Karad i/b. Juris Partner, for RespondentHusband.
Mrs. Shradha Shinde , Applicant/Appellant-Wife in person.
Mr. Satish Shinde , Respondent-Husband is present in Court.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2024
P. C.
of delay in filing the present Appeal. Though there are several blanks
Page 1 of 2 FEBRUARY 16, 2024
Aarti Palkar
10.IA.18175.2022.doc
in the above Interim Application, the same has been taken on record by the Registry. We fail to understand how the Registry has taken an incomplete Interim Application on the record of the file of this Court and numbered the same. We direct that in the future, the Registry shall not take on record any application unless it is complete in all respects.
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 FEBRUARY 16, 2024
Aarti Palkar
Smt. Shradha Satish Shinde
Mr. Satish Vithal Shinde
B. P. COLABAWALLA
SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court