Disposed

Vidyadhar Kesharchand Doshi (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Aruna Vidyadhar Doshi v. Mohan Bhagawan Kakade, Thr. Poa. Jayashri Ashok Kakade

Bombay HC14 Aug 2024IA/17933/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court fixed interim compensation at Rs. 15,000 per month on suitable properties for the suit premises. The applicants must deposit this amount to maintain the stay on the eviction decree, failing which the stay will be automatically vacated.

What did the court decide?

Interim compensation of Rs. 15,000 per month fixed from 12.10.2015; stay continued subject to deposit.

Vidyadhar Kesharchand Doshi (Since Deceased) Thr… — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Gayatri Shimpi

¶2

906-IA-17933-2022.docx

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17933 OF 2022

¶6

WITH

¶7

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17930 OF 2022

¶8

¶9

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 104 OF 2022

¶10

Vidyadhar Kesarchand Doshi (since deceased) through legal heirship 1a. Aruna Vidyadhar Doshi and Anr. ….Applicants V/s.

¶11

Mohan Bhagawan Kakde Thr. POA Jayashri Ashok Kakade and Ors. ….Respondents

¶12

Mr. Mandar Soman, for the Applicants. Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni, for the Respondent.

¶13

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶14

Date : 14 AUGUST 2024.

¶15

P.C. :

¶16

Interim Application is filed for fixing interim compensation in respect of the suit premises for which decree has been passed for eviction on 12 October 2015. Since decree for eviction is passed against the Revision Applicants / Defendants, they have to compensate the Plaintiffs for loss cause due to delay in execution of the decree on account of interim stay granted both by the Appellate Court as well as by this Court.

¶17

___Page No.1 of 2 ___ 14 August 2024

¶18

Gayatri Shimpi

¶19

906-IA-17933-2022.docx

¶20

I have heard Mr. Soman the learned counsel appearing for the original Respondents / Plaintiffs and Mr. Kumbhakoni, the leaned counsel appearing for original Petitioners / Defendants.

¶21

I have also considered, the valuation report as well as the instances sought to be placed on record. It appears that, the suit premises admeasure area 375 sq.ft and are located in the heart of Solapur City.

¶22

In that view of the matter, interim compensation of Rs.15,000/- per month is fixed in respect of the suit premises.

¶23

Accordingly, the Revision Applicants / Defendants shall deposit interim compensation @ Rs.15,000/- per month from 12 October 2015 till 31 October 2024 before the Trial Court on or before 31 October 2024. The Revision Applicants / Defendants shall after continue to deposit the interim compensation @ Rs.15,000/- per month on tenth day of each successive month from November 2024 till decision of the Civil Revision Application. Trial Court shall invest deposited amount in interest bearing deposits. It is clarified that, the stay granted to the execution of decree shall continue to operate only in the event of deposit of amount of interim compensation directed by this Court.

¶24

In the event, of any default on the part of the Revision Applicant in depositing the amount of interim compensation, the interim stay granted by this Court shall automatically stand vacated and the decree shall become executable.

¶25

With the above directions, Interim Application is disposed of.

¶26

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]

¶27

Digitally signed GAYATRI by GAYATRIRAJENDRA RAJENDRA SHIMPI SHIMPI Date:2024.08.16 13:10:20 +0530

¶28

___Page No.2 of 2 ___ 14 August 2024

Vidyadhar Kesharchand Doshi (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Aruna Vidyadhar Doshi v. Mohan Bhagawan Kakade, Thr. Poa. Jayashri Ashok Kakade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidyadhar Kesharchand Doshi (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Aruna Vidyadhar Doshi v. Mohan Bhagawan Kakade, Thr. Poa. Jayashri Ashok Kakade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krantikari Kamgar Union vs Kuoni Travel (I)Pvt.Ltd.

Ruby Builders through Its Partner Mahasukhlala Manila Shah vs State of Maharashtra through the Government Pleader

Late Shri. Tatyaba Babaji Bobade Decd Thru Lhrs vs the State of Maharashtra through Prin. Secretary, Minister of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Laser Shaving India Private Limited vs Rkrm International Products Private Limited

Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. Thr. Representative Manoj Jain vs Suparshva Commodities a Partnership Firm and Ors.

Mihir Abhay Ambekar vs Shamrao Vithoba Bhargude and Ors.