Allowed

Shabbir Ismail Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC20 Feb 2024IA/1746/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of an interim application seeking suspension of sentence and bail. The Court, noting the appeal's delay and applicant's past bail conduct, suspended the sentence under POCSO and IPC 506 and enlarged the applicant on bail with specific restrictions against contacting the victim.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended; applicant enlarged on bail with fresh bonds; conditions imposed to prevent contact with victim and entry near victim's residence.

Shabbir Ismail Shaikh Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AS:8057

¶2

Diksha Rane 49.ia.1746-23.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1746 OF 2023 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.548 OF 2023

¶6

SHABBIR ISMAIL SHAIKH

¶7

..APPLICANT

¶8

VS.

¶9

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS

¶10

Adv. V. S. Tiwari a/w. Adv. Priti Tiwari, Adv. Priya Muthupandi for the applicant.

¶11

Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the State.

¶12

Adv. Ashwini B. Jadhav for the respondent no.2.

¶13

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶14

DATE : FEBRUARY 20, 2024.

¶15

P.C. :

¶16

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

¶17

2. This is an application for suspension of sentence and bail. The conviction is under Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter “POCSO Act”, for short) whereby the applicant is sentenced to suffer three years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.3000/-. The applicant is also convicted under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Court (hereafter ‘IPC’ for short) and is

¶18

1/3

¶19

Diksha Rane 49.ia.1746-23.doc

¶20

sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. The fine has been paid.

¶21

3. The application is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.2. It is submitted that the trial Court by giving cogent reasons convicted the applicant. It is further submitted that even during the pendency of the trial, the applicant has been pressurizing the victim to settle the matter. This is denied by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶22

4. The appeal has been admitted. The appeal is unlikely to be heard any time soon. Considering the duration of the sentence and as the applicant has not misused the liberty while he was on bail, having regard to the fact that the appeal is unlikely to be heard any time soon, I am inclined to suspend the sentence and enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶23

5. The sentence imposed by the trial Court is suspended and the applicant be enlarged on same bail as before the trial Court but with fresh P. R. bonds.

¶24

6. It is made clear that the applicant shall not establish any contact with the victim and shall not enter the vicinity where the victim is residing.

¶25

2/3

¶26

Diksha Rane 49.ia.1746-23.doc

¶27

7. The application is disposed of.

¶28

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶29

3/3

¶30

Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2024 17:42:59

Shabbir Ismail Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabbir Ismail Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Baburao Waghchaure Vs State of Maharashtra

Samir Dadamiya Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra

Anurag Ravindra Umaley Vs State of Maharashtra

Pravin Krushna Marale Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Padmashree Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Anr. vs the Cosmos Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Chaudhary and Anr. Vs CBI Acb Mumbai and Anr.