Interim application for condonation of 147 days delay in filing a Criminal Appeal was disposed of by condoning the delay and fixing hearing date, despite NSEL's opposition to allow the appeal to be registered.
Condonation of delay and registration of the appeal; interim application disposed off; appeal listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 17 IA 1676-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1676 of 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 8773 OF 2024
.. Krishnawanti Satpal Nagpal Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents …
Mr. Pradeep Yadav with Mr.Saumitra Salunke i/b Ms.Swapnali Chavan for the applicant.
Ms.Rebecca Gonsalves, Spl. P.P with Mr.J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
Mr.Arvind Lakhawat with Mr.Nimeet Sharma and Mr.Vinit Vaidya i/b MZM Legal LLP for respondent no.3.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE,JJ.
DATED : 8th JULY, 2024
P.C:-
1 The present Application seek condonation of delay of 147 days in filing the Criminal Appeal, and on hearing the counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel representing the National Spot Exchange Limited (for short ‘NSEL’), we are inclined to grant the application, despite a strong opposition staked by the NSEL.
Tilak
2/2 17 IA 1676-24.doc
The objection being raised on merits of the matter, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay and allow the application resulting into registration of the Appeal filed by the appellant.
Interim Application stand disposed off.
List the Appeal for hearing on 22/7/2024.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE,J)
(BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Tilak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 147 days in filing the Criminal Appeal despite opposition.
Whether to entertain the merits of the objection raised by the respondent.
Krishnawanti Satpal Nagpal
The State of Maharashtra
National Spot Exchange Limited
Bharati Dangre
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
