Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh v. Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a probate matter involving the estate of a deceased person. Caveator's counsel undertook to file vakalatnama and sought time for affidavit-in-reply; the court set deadlines and adjourned.
What the court decided
38-IA1605-2024INCAVEAT126-2023.DOC
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Santosh
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.11.21 10:08:00 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1605 OF 2024 IN CAVEAT NO. 126 OF 2023 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2522 OF 2021
Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh ....Applicant/ Org. Caveatee
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN In the matter of Petition for Probate to the property and credits of Ram Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh ...Deceased
Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh ....Caveatee / Plaintiff Versus Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh ….Caveator / Defendant
- Adv. Ratna Bhargavan, a/w Rahul Yadav, i/b R. Bhargavan & Associates, for the Applicant.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh
- respondent
Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh
- other
Ram Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
20 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court