Rishi Raj Tejuja v. Namrata Manoharlal Hinduja and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application listed for supply of copies for issuing notices; despite four weeks' time granted, applicant's advocate failed to comply. Registrar granted one final two-week opportunity to supply copies, with automatic dismissal against respondent Nos. 1 to 4 on default.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 17004 OF 2023
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 19/07/2024
Adv. Anil Pandey i/by Savj Law solutions present for the Applicant
The above numbered Interim Application is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant in Interim Application No. 1384 of 2024
- respondent
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
Coram
S. R. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Suresh Bhimrao Kuthade and Ors. vs Pushpa Arun Mendvade and Ors.
Balasaheb Dnyanoba Ghenand vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Mantralaya and Ors.
Pandurang Chintaman Kengar vs Bruhanmath Hotgi Thr Its Chairman and Ors.
Gulistan Shah Saqlian Co-Op Housing Society Ltd., Mumbai vs M/S. Gazi Construction, Mumbai and Anr.