Arpita Rajput v. Avinash Kumar Rastogi
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in an interim application within a family court appeal. Due to paucity of time the matter was stood over to a later date, with any existing interim order continuing until then.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1381 OF 2024
In
Family Court Appeal 22 OF 2024
Arpita Rajput ....PETITIONER V/S
Avinash Kumar Rastogi ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA &
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 18th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arpita Rajput
- respondent
Avinash Kumar Rastogi
Coram
B.P. Colabawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri. Prashant Shivajirao Sanap vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Marketing and Textiles Dept. and Ors.
Vilas Yadav Zimre vs Sharvari Vilas Zimre Alias Ms. Subhangi Mukund Pawar
Rahim Munawar Pathan vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Cfm Asset Reconstruction Private Limited through Ms. Sapana Desai vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.