Disposed

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mr. Shankar Kumar Kishan Singh and Anr.

Bombay HC11 Dec 2024IA/13527/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar granted a second chance to supply copies for serving notices on respondents after the applicant failed to do so within the previously granted two-week period. The order directs that failure to supply copies within two weeks will result in dismissal of the Interim Application.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to supply copies; otherwise application stands dismissed.

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Mr… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13527 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 25802 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 11/12/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered Interim Application is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is

¶10

lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time (excluding Christmas Vacation) is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the Interim Application would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks.

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-11.12.2024

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mr. Shankar Kumar Kishan Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mr. Shankar Kumar Kishan Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ravindranath Baburao Khawale vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, R/North Ward

Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vashi, Thane vs Vijay Pandurang Salvi and Ors.

Vidyadhar Kesharchand Doshi (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Pushpak Vidyadhar Doshi vs Smt. Fulabai Ankush Vibhute

Saraswati Popat Sankpal and Ors. vs Rohit Shankarrao Shinde and Ors.

Khozema Tayabally Tawawala vs Ibrahim Gulam Husain Tawawala (Since Deceased Thr. His Lrs.) 1.ASMA Ibrahim Tawawala and Ors.

Mr. Purushottam Shivram Khandare vs Union of India, Thr. General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai