Disposed

Ramchandra Ambadas Dalavi v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Jan 2024IA/132/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, in an interim criminal revision application regarding a prosecution under the Essential Commodities Act, condoned the delay in filing. The interim application was disposed of, with objections regarding the maintainability of the revision kept open.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing revision application condoned. Interim application disposed of. Objections regarding maintainability kept open.

Ramchandra Ambadas Dalavi Vs State of Maharashtra — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA PALLAVI WARGAONKAR MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2024.01.20 15:24:55 +0530

¶2

27-IA-132-2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.132 OF 2024 (E-FILING) IN

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.24155 OF 2023

¶6

Ramchandra Ambadas Dalavi ...Applicant

¶7

vs.

¶8

State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents

¶9

¶10

Mr. Rahul S. Kadam, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for State.

¶11

¶12

CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 18^th JANUARY 2024

¶13

P. C. :-

¶14

Heard learned Advocate Shri Kadam for the Applicant – Accused.

¶15

He is prosecuted for the offence under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. His truck was seized and there was allegation that he was transporting ‘Wheat’, the Collector, Pune as per order dated 11^th March 2022, gave the following two directions:-

¶16

(i) To sell the Wheat by way of public auction and deposit the amount in the Government Treasury.

¶17

(ii) The truck be returned to the Applicant on furnishing Bank guarantee after valuation is done (page 85).

¶18

Applicant has filed a Writ Petition before this Court. It is for quashing as well as for return of the seized truck. Quashing was not allowed, however, the Applicant was granted liberty to apply before the

1/2

Pallavi

27-IA-132-2024.doc

concerned Court. The order is not annexed. Let it be placed on record on the next date.

¶23

When the Applicant applied before the Court of J.M.F.C., Indapur, the prayer was rejected as per order dated 25^th July 2023 (page 95). The legality of the said order is challenged by way of revision.

¶24

There is delay in filing Revision Application. It is opposed by the learned APP. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned.

¶25

Interim Application is disposed of.

¶26

All objections about maintainability of this revision before this Court is kept open.

¶27

[S. M. MODAK, J.]

¶28

2/2

¶29

Pallavi

Ramchandra Ambadas Dalavi v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchandra Ambadas Dalavi v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayan Atmaram Bhandari Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Government Pleader and Others

Narayan Atmaram Bhandari Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Government Pleader and Others

Rakesh Dubey Vs Shree Ambika Printers

Pradeepkumar Eknath Sarang Vs Laxman Dhondiba Kokare and Anr.

Omprakash@Babloo@Arun Vishwanath Prasad Shrivastav vs the State of Maharashtra

Bahubali Tatyaso Dhamane vs State of Maharashtra