Criminal appeal against acquittal under Section 138 NI Act. Parties settled the dispute and the appellant-complainant chose not to prosecute the appeal further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SATISH SANGAR RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.01.22 11:18:32 +0530
10-APEAL-1009-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2015
Pradeepkumar Eknath Sarang
...Appellant
vs.
Laxman Dhondiba Kokare and Anr. …Respondents
*********
Mr.Santosh Deshpande a/w Mr.Kishor Bhatia – Advocate for Appellant.
Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar – APP for Respondent No.2 – State. Mr.Pradeepkumar Sarang – Appellant present in person. Mr.Laxman Kokare – Respondent No.1 present in person.
*********
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 18th JANUARY 2024
P. C. :-
Respondent No.1 is not represented by an Advocate. On 19th December, 2023, a bailable warrant was issued against him. On 5th January, 2024, he appeared and both the parties expressed desire to settle the dispute.
not want to prosecute this Appeal any further.
Satish Sangar
1/2
10-APEAL-1009-2015.doc
Satish Sangar
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradeepkumar Eknath Sarang
Laxman Dhondiba Kokare
State
S. M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
