Caveator sought declaration of no delay or condonation in lodging caveat in testamentary proceedings. Petitioner, noting settlement and consent terms, raised no objection; the court condoned the delay, directed registration of caveats, conversion of the petition into a Testamentary Suit, and disposed of the applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34-ia-1312-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1312 OF 2024 IN CAVEAT (L) NO.15418 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1314 OF 2024 IN CAVEAT (L) NO.15420 OF 2021 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.482 OF 2021
Sharmela Ramesh Iyer ...Petitioner vs.
Foram Desai ...Respondent
Mr. Aditya Raut i/b. Desai Desai, for he Petitioner. Ms. Simantini Mohite a/w. Mr. Robin Fernandes, Mr. Sukrit Parashar & Ms. Lillyan Thangkhiew i/b. Vesta Legal, for the Caveators.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : JUNE 24, 2024
P.C.:
that there is no delay in lodging the Caveat and, in the alternative, to condone the delay in filing the Caveat.
Vishal Parekar
...1
34-ia-1312-2024.doc
the delay in lodging the Caveat deserves to be condoned.
converted into Testamentary Suit.
Applications disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar
...2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the delay in lodging the Caveat be condoned?
Sharmela Ramesh Iyer
Foram Desai
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
