Nitin Dinanath Shirkar v. Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application treated as dead, admitting rejection of first appeal on account of omission; disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13081 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 19271 OF 2023
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 20/12/2024
Adv. Shivani Pavale i/by Adv. Tejas Bhide present for the respondent No. 2
The office remark discloses that learned advocate for the applicant has not removed the office objection within stipulated period, as per conditional order dated 26/11/2024 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-II), therefore, First Appeal (Stamp) No. 19271 of 2023 has been given rejection registered number. Hence, this Interim Application No. 13081 of 2024 for additional evidence does not survive and it is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)
sat-R(J-II)-20.12.2024
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court